Found occurrence of `.step_by(0)`RS-E1003
Calling .step_by(0) on an iterator panics. Consider using panic! if this is intentional.
Bad Practice
[1, 2, 3].iter().step_by(0);
for _ in (0..100).step_by(0) {
// ...
}
Calling .step_by(0) on an iterator panics. Consider using panic! if this is intentional.
[1, 2, 3].iter().step_by(0);
for _ in (0..100).step_by(0) {
// ...
}